Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Full RDF with vermiwash gave higher onion manganese and copper uptake at harvest.

A claim from Impact of foliar application of vermiwash on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of onion · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full RDF with vermiwash gave higher onion manganese and copper uptake at harvest.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100 per cent RDF with foliar spray of vermiwashe0
Outcome
manganese and copper uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
at harveste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100 per cent RDF with foliar spray of vermiwash showed higher manganese and copper uptake by onion at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1739

Title

Impact of foliar application of vermiwash on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of onion

A B Jadhav; V S Patil; A B Gosavi; et al. Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture 2025. doi:10.48165/jefa.2025.20.2.8

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-5c7d7a73cd8394d22984dfd50025b482a181350751d67ff8a677a63a9afbf09e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 81 positive, 9 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.