Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 at 1500 ppm for 24 hours gave a minimum 35.66 days to complete germination, at par with GA3 at 1000 ppm.

A claim from Seed Priming for Improving Seed Germination and Growth of Peach cv. Sharbati · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 1500 ppm for 24 hours gave a minimum 35.66 days to complete germination, at par with GA3 at 1000 ppm.

Material
Sharbatit0
Treatment
GA3 @ 1500 ppm for 24 hourse0
Outcome
complete germinatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
35.66 dayse0
Qualifier
at pare0
Comparator
GA3 @ 1000 ppm for 24 hourse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peach cv. Sharbati”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–76
e0

“seeds treated with GA3 @ 1500 ppm for 24 hours recorded the minimum days (22.00 days) required for initiation of germination, 50 per cent germination (28.66 days), complete germination (35.66 days) and maximum germination (46.66 % and 66.66 %) which was at par with the application of GA3 @ 1000 ppm for 24 hours”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1183

Title

Seed Priming for Improving Seed Germination and Growth of Peach cv. Sharbati

Gurjeet Kaur, Veerpartap Singh Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2022. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7480050

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5efb4e00e4b24fb1811dda4beddfe47307e66462c46e2bbe05858aebe07c85b6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.