Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher solution Mg significantly increased Mg concentration in peach leaves, stems and roots.

A claim from Influence of Magnesium Concentrations in Nutrient Solution on Growth, Tissue Concentration, and Nutrient Uptake of Peach Seedlings1 · 1981

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher solution Mg significantly increased Mg concentration in peach leaves, stems and roots.

Treatment
Increasing Mg in the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
Mg concentration in the leaves, stems, and rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing Mg in the nutrient solution significantly increased Mg concentration in the leaves, stems, and roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–551
e1

“‘Babygold 5’ peach [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–70

Title

Influence of Magnesium Concentrations in Nutrient Solution on Growth, Tissue Concentration, and Nutrient Uptake of Peach Seedlings1

J. H. Edwards; B. D. Horton Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1981. doi:10.21273/jashs.106.4.401

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-604c410ea0938dc27681c0e065d35c044d3eb5496235235b4f2826de2878fbdf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.