Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Leaf phosphorus concentration did not change.

A claim from Diagnostic leaf analysis for stone fruit. 7. Effects of fertilizer nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on leaf composition of peach · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf phosphorus concentration did not change.

Treatment
Fertilizer nitrogene1
Outcome
Phosphorus concentratione0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus concentration was not changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–452
e1

“Fertilizer nitrogen increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 234–263
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131

Title

Diagnostic leaf analysis for stone fruit. 7. Effects of fertilizer nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on leaf composition of peach

DR Leece Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1976. doi:10.1071/ea9760775

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-08a70f3c7dbd2cbd09991390281cce007ee91cf3d32fc6a53df77e1407068158 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.