Paper · 1969 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

Responses of peach seedlings in sand culture to factorial combinations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sheep manure

den Ende B van; BK Talor

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A factorial experiment was done on Elberta peach seedlings growing in sand culture to test tree response to applied solutions of calcium nitrate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate, and to sheep manure which had been mixed throughout the sand before planting. Results showed that the phosphate and sheep manure treatments exerted a more pronounced influence on seedling growth and leaf nutrient composition when harvested after 9 weeks than did the nitrogen treatments. In the absence of sheep manure, seedling growth was increased by increasing the phosphate supply to the maximum tested (64 p.p.m. P). A strong, negative interaction was found between phosphate and sheep manure treatments in both seedling growth and leaf composition data, and it is concluded that the sheep manure served as a rich source of phosphate in this situation. In addition, application of sheep manure (except in the presence of 64 p.p.m. P) apparently increased uptake of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg by the seedlings, and also increased the concentrations of Ca, K, and P in the leaves. Other results relating to leaf composition are discussed and it is suggested that a Ca/Mg antagonism was operative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate and manure affected seedling growth more strongly than nitrogen.

Treatment
phosphate and sheep manure treatmentse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
after 9 weekse0
Comparator
nitrogen treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phosphate and sheep manure treatments exerted a more pronounced influence on seedling growth and leaf nutrient composition when harvested after 9 weeks than did the nitrogen treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate and manure affected leaf nutrient composition more strongly than nitrogen.

Treatment
phosphate and sheep manure treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf nutrient compositione0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
after 9 weekse0
Comparator
nitrogen treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phosphate and sheep manure treatments exerted a more pronounced influence on seedling growth and leaf nutrient composition when harvested after 9 weeks than did the nitrogen treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–465 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the absence of manure, more phosphate increased seedling growth up to the highest tested supply.

Treatment
increasing the phosphate supplye0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
64 p.p.m. Pe0
Qualifier
absence of sheep manuree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of sheep manure, seedling growth was increased by increasing the phosphate supply to the maximum tested (64 p.p.m. P).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate and manure had a strong negative interaction for seedling growth.

Treatment
phosphate and sheep manure treatmentse0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong, negative interaction was found between phosphate and sheep manure treatments in both seedling growth and leaf composition data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate and manure had a strong negative interaction for leaf composition.

Treatment
phosphate and sheep manure treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf compositione0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A strong, negative interaction was found between phosphate and sheep manure treatments in both seedling growth and leaf composition data”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that manure was a rich phosphate source.

Treatment
sheep manuree0
Outcome
rich source of phosphatee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is concluded that the sheep manure served as a rich source of phosphate in this situation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure apparently increased seedling uptake of N, P, and K except at the highest phosphate supply.

Treatment
application of sheep manuree0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, Ke0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except in the presence of 64 p.p.m. Pe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sheep manure (except in the presence of 64 p.p.m. P) apparently increased uptake of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg by the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure apparently increased seedling uptake of Ca and Mg except at the highest phosphate supply.

Treatment
application of sheep manuree0
Outcome
Ca, and Mge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except in the presence of 64 p.p.m. Pe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of sheep manure (except in the presence of 64 p.p.m. P) apparently increased uptake of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg by the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure increased leaf Ca, K, and P concentrations.

Outcome
concentrations of Ca, K, and P in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“also increased the concentrations of Ca, K, and P in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested calcium-magnesium antagonism.

Outcome
Ca/Mg antagonisme0
Qualifier
operativee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is suggested that a Ca/Mg antagonism was operative.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.