Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar fertilizers positively affected maize nutrient absorption and uptake.

A claim from THE RESEARCH ON NON-CONVENTIONAL FOLIAR FERTILIZERS WITH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES APPLIED TO MAIZE CROP · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilizers positively affected maize nutrient absorption and uptake.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
FOLIAR FERTILIZERS WITH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATESt0
Outcome
nutrient absorption and uptakee0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had a positive effect on nutrient absorption and uptake in the tested plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–686
t0

“FOLIAR FERTILIZERS WITH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES APPLIED TO MAIZE CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–99

Title

THE RESEARCH ON NON-CONVENTIONAL FOLIAR FERTILIZERS WITH PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES APPLIED TO MAIZE CROP

Irina-Adriana CHIURCIU; Daniela DANA; Andreea FIRATOIU; et al. Annals of the University of Craiova - Agriculture Montanology Cadastre Series 2023. doi:10.52846/aamc.v52i1.1363

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-63e3345f2efba350febef904dfec249157f39d2fe40a587258dac3d864aada08 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,164 papers: 1,026 positive, 138 negative or no effect

1,025 papers in the same direction as this claim · 127 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,155 papers more in this group

See all 1,164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.