Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment significantly increased nutrient content and uptake.

A claim from Effect of Different Levels of Chemical and Nano Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Yield and Yield attributes of Sorghum Crop (Sorghum bicolor L.) cv. Gundri · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment significantly increased nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) cropSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizere1
Outcome
content and uptake of nutrientse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–280
e1

“application of 2.5 time reduction of RDN through nano fertilizer significantly increased growth parameters, yields and quality characters of sorghum crop. This also brought significant increase in content and uptake of nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–997

Title

Effect of Different Levels of Chemical and Nano Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Yield and Yield attributes of Sorghum Crop (Sorghum bicolor L.) cv. Gundri

Barkha Rani; Bhorania Nirali; N. M. Zalawadia; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.808.332

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-66330246489ac1a12673b8e21c4b2222a399e41f6d73f2425e5ff8068652a963 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.