Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic acid improved available soil N retention under water stress to 2.36 ppm.

A claim from Salicylic Acid with Humic Acid Addition as Potential Hallmarks for Alleviating Drought Stress in Maize Crop and Enhancing Soil Health · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid improved available soil N retention under water stress to 2.36 ppm.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Humic acide1
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
2.36 ppme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, soil nutrient retention is also improved to large extent under water stress state; SOM content (0.49%), available N (2.36 ppm), available P (15.67 ppm) and available K (171.94 ppm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2362–2554
e1

“Humic acid also positively impacted the drought stress and improved the maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2321
t0

“Maize Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107

Title

Salicylic Acid with Humic Acid Addition as Potential Hallmarks for Alleviating Drought Stress in Maize Crop and Enhancing Soil Health

Nasir Mehmood Khan; Ghulam Mujtaba; Muhammad Ahmed Irfan; et al. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture 2024. doi:10.9734/arja/2024/v17i1406

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-663ee2b10831f5db8484899daff39564dcb59602fc4b8af9613bdb601e15bf31 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

other · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.