Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Girdling increased flavonol concentration in skin and pulp at harvest.

A claim from Trunk Girdling Increased Stomatal Conductance in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines, Reduced Glutamine, and Increased Malvidin-3-Glucoside and Quercetin-3-Glucoside Concentrations in Skins and Pulp at Harvest · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling increased flavonol concentration in skin and pulp at harvest.

Taxon
GrapevinesVitist0
Organ / stage
skin/pulp tissuese0
Treatment
girdlinge0
Outcome
flavonole0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, girdling significantly increased stomatal conductance (gs) in vines, decreased glutamine concentrations, and increased anthocyanin and flavonol concentrations in the skin/pulp tissues of grape berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1409
t0

“Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–78
e1

“At harvest, girdling significantly increased stomatal conductance (gs) in vines, decreased glutamine concentrations, and increased anthocyanin and flavonol concentrations in the skin/pulp tissues of grape berries.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1409

Title

Trunk Girdling Increased Stomatal Conductance in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevines, Reduced Glutamine, and Increased Malvidin-3-Glucoside and Quercetin-3-Glucoside Concentrations in Skins and Pulp at Harvest

Giuliano E. Pereira; Emily M. T. Padhi; Raul C. Girardello; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2020. doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00707

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-6a2766662c4dd850dadcf2e55465c357fa84a899a7f72f9cc222ca99d1b05c3a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pruning · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.