Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed free produced 70.9 higher wheat grain yield than the weedy check in 2016–17.

A claim from Performance of different herbicides on wheat grain yield and correlation between growth and yield attributes of wheat and weeds · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free produced 70.9 higher wheat grain yield than the weedy check in 2016–17.

Treatment
Weed freee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
70.9e0
Qualifier
2016–17e0
Comparator
weedy check treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed free, pinoxaden + metsufuron and pendimethalin fb pinoxaden treatments produced 70.9, 67.7 and 64.9; 69.4, 67.0 and 64.3% higher grain yield as compared to weedy check treatment, respectively during 2016–17 and 2017–18”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–676
t0

“wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–56

Title

Performance of different herbicides on wheat grain yield and correlation between growth and yield attributes of wheat and weeds

Amandeep Kaur; Samunder Singh Indian Journal of Weed Science 2019. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2019.00029.7

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-6dcff6feae8895cd0e956c64d26df14bb4733573ba247aa9ddc000073872c3a3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.