Claim · model-written summary
Preplant soil dicamba did not significantly reduce soybean yield.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- dicambae0
- Outcome
- soybean yieldse0
- Direction
- did not reducee0
- Value
- 4 oz/Ae0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil incorporated applications of 2,4-D or dicamba at rates up to 8 oz/A or 4 oz/A, respectively, just before planting soybeans did not reduce soybean yields significantly.”
Title
Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram
L. M. Wax; L. A. Knuth; F. W. Slife Weed Science 1969. doi:10.1017/s004317450005431x
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Preplant soil 2,4-D did not significantly reduce soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Preplant picloram reduced soybean yield almost 40% at half an ounce per acre.
- Intervention effect Picloram caused leaf malformation in soybeans planted the following year.
- Intervention effect Picloram did not reduce yield in soybeans planted the following year.
- Intervention effect Foliar 2,4-D had little effect on soybean yield at prebloom.
- Intervention effect Foliar 2,4-D slightly reduced soybean yield during flowering.
- Intervention effect Dicamba injured prebloom soybeans more than 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect Picloram injured prebloom soybeans more than 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect Dicamba restricted soybean development during flowering.
- Intervention effect Picloram restricted soybean development during flowering.
- Intervention effect Half an ounce per acre dicamba reduced soybean yield about 50% during flowering.
- Intervention effect One eighth of an ounce per acre picloram reduced soybean yield about 50% during flowering.