Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NAA treatment had additional net returns of 21.2 103/ha.

A claim from Effect of sulphur and plant-growth regulators on growth, yield and economics of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA treatment had additional net returns of 21.2 103/ha.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
NAA @ 40 ppm twice at 25 and 50 DASe1
Outcome
additional net returnse0
Direction
maximume0
Value
21.2 103/hae0
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum additional net returns of 21.2 103/ha and benefit: cost ratio (2.01:1) were also obtained under this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1821
e1

“Application of NAA @ 40 ppm twice at 25 and 50 DAS significantly enhanced the pod and haulm yields by 33.8 and 18.1% over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1594
t0

“summer groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–96

Title

Effect of sulphur and plant-growth regulators on growth, yield and economics of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)

CHETRAM SAINI; N.K. JAIN; R.K. MATHUKIA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v61i1.4335

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-70464d5a15ed817be544172ba22e44b05bb2ddd605b283df4896bceabd021700 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.