Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest watering regime delayed Tiller 2 appearance in aestivum.

A claim from Tiller Development and Contribution to Yield under Different Moisture Regimes in two Triticum Species · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest watering regime delayed Tiller 2 appearance in aestivum.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivumTriticum aestivume3
Material
aestivume0
Treatment
highest watering regimee1
Outcome
Tiller 2e2
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its appearance was delayed in aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–713
e1

“highest watering regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–558
e2

“Tiller 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–624
e3

“Triticum aestivum L. ssp. aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–349

Title

Tiller Development and Contribution to Yield under Different Moisture Regimes in two Triticum Species

M. G. Mosaad; G. Ortiz‐Ferrara; V. Mahalakshmi Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.1995.tb01100.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-721703217de07192900592e4fc5d8dcb47ffda05b88630f346669a683704dc02 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.