Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A 30% irrigation deduction was predicted to reduce wheat yield by less than 6% at three sites.

A claim from Using Yield-Stress Model in Irrigation Management for Wheat Grown in Egypt · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A 30% irrigation deduction was predicted to reduce wheat yield by less than 6% at three sites.

Treatment
deducting 30% of full irrigatione0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
less than 6%e0
Comparator
full irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under deducting 30% of full irrigation, wheat yield will be reduced by less than 6% at the three sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1286

Title

Using Yield-Stress Model in Irrigation Management for Wheat Grown in Egypt

Samiha Abou; El-Fetouh Ouda; Fouad Khalil; et al. Journal of Applied Biological Sciences 2008

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-e06a94234ef5db65c015e8e8e7752ac8af197f77fcb43e35ba3c833df80f44fe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.