Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Production

WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR SOME WHEAT CULTIVARS IN NORTH NILE DELTA

M. Kassab; E. Moursi; M. Ibrahim

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, North Nile Delta region during the two growing seasons (2008/2009 and 2009/2010) to find out the response of some wheat cultivars to different irrigation levels. Four wheat cultivars were subjected to 3 irrigation levels based on: soil moisture depletion (SMD) in the effective root zone, Ibrahim’s equation (ETP = 0.1642 + 0.8 EP) and watering till 5.0 cm above the soil surface. The wheat cultivars were: Sakha 93, Giza 168, Gemmeiza 7 and Gemmeiza 9. The most important results could be summarized as follows: The highest mean values of grain yield were recorded from Giza 168 wheat cultivar and the lowest mean values were obtained from Gemmeiza 9. Concerning irrigation treatments, the mean values of wheat grain yield can be descended in order as follows; irrigation till 5.0 cm > Ibrahim’s equation > soil moisture depletion (SMD). For straw yield, the highest mean values were recorded from Sakha 93 and Gemmeiza 7 with values of 6444.31 and 6486.03 kg/fed., respectively. Regarding irrigation treatments the highest mean values were recorded with Ibrahim’s equation and the mean values were 6175.27 and 6161.43 kg/fed. in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. The mean values for biological yield, the highest mean values were recorded under Giza 168 wheat cultivar in the two growing seasons and with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface. The mean values of 1000 grain weight can be descended in order as follows: Giza 168 > Sakha 93 > Gemmeiza 7 > Gemmeiza 9 for irrigation treatments, the highest mean values were recorded with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface. Moreover, the highest mean values of harvest index were recorded under Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar and under irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface. For water relations, the mean values of water utilization efficiency (W.Ut.E) and water use efficiency (W.U.E.) were obtained from Giza 168 wheat cultivar and irrigation according to soil moisture depletion (SMD). The values of actual waterconsumptive use for all studied cultivars were rather similar but under Gemmeiza 9 the mean values were slightly higher. While, the highest found mean values were under irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface. Values of water applied for the studied wheat cultivars can be descended in order as followsGiza 168 > Gemmeiza 9 > Gemmeiza 7 > Sakha 93. While, for irrigation treatments the mean values can be descended in order irrigation till 5.0 cm > SMD > Ibrahim’s equation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 168 had the highest grain yield; Gemmeiza 9 the lowest.

Material
Giza 168e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Gemmeiza 9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mean values of grain yield were recorded from Giza 168 wheat cultivar and the lowest mean values were obtained from Gemmeiza 9.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranked irrigation to 5.0 cm above Ibrahim’s equation above SMD.

Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
descendede0
Comparator
soil moisture depletion (SMD)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean values of wheat grain yield can be descended in order as follows; irrigation till 5.0 cm > Ibrahim’s equation > soil moisture depletion (SMD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–945 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 93 produced straw yield of 6444.31 kg/fed.

Material
Sakha 93e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6444.31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For straw yield, the highest mean values were recorded from Sakha 93 and Gemmeiza 7 with values of 6444.31 and 6486.03 kg/fed., respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 7 produced straw yield of 6486.03 kg/fed.

Material
Gemmeiza 7e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6486.03 kg/fed.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For straw yield, the highest mean values were recorded from Sakha 93 and Gemmeiza 7 with values of 6444.31 and 6486.03 kg/fed., respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ibrahim’s equation gave the highest straw yield, 6175.27 kg/fed. in the first season.

Treatment
Ibrahim’s equatione0
Outcome
highest mean valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6175.27e0
Qualifier
firste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation treatments the highest mean values were recorded with Ibrahim’s equation and the mean values were 6175.27 and 6161.43 kg/fed. in the first and second growing seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ibrahim’s equation gave 6161.43 kg/fed. straw yield in the second season.

Treatment
Ibrahim’s equatione0
Outcome
highest mean valuese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6161.43 kg/fed.e0
Qualifier
second growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding irrigation treatments the highest mean values were recorded with Ibrahim’s equation and the mean values were 6175.27 and 6161.43 kg/fed. in the first and second growing seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 168 and irrigation to 5.0 cm gave the highest biological yield.

Material
Giza 168e0
Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surfacee0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean values for biological yield, the highest mean values were recorded under Giza 168 wheat cultivar in the two growing seasons and with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 168 ranked highest for 1000 grain weight.

Material
Giza 168e0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte0
Direction
descendede0
Comparator
Gemmeiza 9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean values of 1000 grain weight can be descended in order as follows: Giza 168 > Sakha 93 > Gemmeiza 7 > Gemmeiza 9 for irrigation treatments, the highest mean values were recorded with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation to 5.0 cm gave the highest 1000 grain weight.

Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surfacee0
Outcome
1000 grain weighte1
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest mean values were recorded with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1708 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean values of 1000 grain weight can be descended in order as follows: Giza 168 > Sakha 93 > Gemmeiza 7 > Gemmeiza 9 for irrigation treatments, the highest mean values were recorded with irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1475–1708 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 9 and irrigation to 5.0 cm gave the highest harvest index.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e0
Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surfacee0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest mean values of harvest index were recorded under Gemmeiza 9 wheat cultivar and under irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1858 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Giza 168 under SMD had the reported water utilization and use efficiency results.

Material
Giza 168e0
Treatment
soil moisture depletion (SMD)e0
Outcome
water utilization efficiency (W.Ut.E) and water use efficiency (W.U.E.)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean values of water utilization efficiency (W.Ut.E) and water use efficiency (W.U.E.) were obtained from Giza 168 wheat cultivar and irrigation according to soil moisture depletion (SMD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–2072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemmeiza 9 had slightly higher actual water consumption.

Material
Gemmeiza 9e0
Outcome
actual waterconsumptive usee0
Direction
slightly highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of actual waterconsumptive use for all studied cultivars were rather similar but under Gemmeiza 9 the mean values were slightly higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2219 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation to 5.0 cm had the highest actual water consumption.

Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surfacee0
Outcome
actual waterconsumptive usee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of actual waterconsumptive use for all studied cultivars were rather similar but under Gemmeiza 9 the mean values were slightly higher. While, the highest found mean values were under irrigation till 5.0 cm above soil surface.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2310 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water applied ranked Giza 168 above Gemmeiza 9, Gemmeiza 7 and Sakha 93.

Material
Giza 168e0
Outcome
water appliede0
Direction
descendede0
Comparator
Sakha 93e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Values of water applied for the studied wheat cultivars can be descended in order as followsGiza 168 > Gemmeiza 9 > Gemmeiza 7 > Sakha 93.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2311–2449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water applied ranked irrigation to 5.0 cm above SMD and Ibrahim’s equation.

Treatment
irrigation till 5.0 cme0
Outcome
water appliede1
Direction
descendede0
Comparator
Ibrahim’s equatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for irrigation treatments the mean values can be descended in order irrigation till 5.0 cm > SMD > Ibrahim’s equation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2457–2575 · show in text ↑
e1

“Values of water applied for the studied wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2311–2366 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–33 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.