Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rice microbial biomass C with 100% NPK + FYM was highest in four soil depths compared with all other treatments.

A claim from Crop Productivity and Soil Biological Properties Influenced by Long Term Application of Mineral Fertilizers and Manures under Rice-Wheat Sequence on Mollisols of Northern India · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice microbial biomass C with 100% NPK + FYM was highest in four soil depths compared with all other treatments.

Treatment
100% NPK + FYMe5
Outcome
microbial biomass Ce5
Direction
higheste6
Value
413.36, 193.50, 100.11 and 66.41e5
Qualifier
four soil depthse5
Comparator
all other treatmentse7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The observed microbial biomass C with 100% NPK + FYM in four soil depths were (413.36, 193.50, 100.11 and 66.41 after rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1051
e6

“which was highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1140
e7

“over all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1191

Title

Crop Productivity and Soil Biological Properties Influenced by Long Term Application of Mineral Fertilizers and Manures under Rice-Wheat Sequence on Mollisols of Northern India

Vineet Kumar; Shri Ram; Ramesh Chandra International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2019. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2019.809.036

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-774eb250ea26b367b74fd0dea18df3fdcf1446f6d1759c6d49e0b384fbf947a8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

fertilization · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 88 positive, 11 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.