Paper · 2015 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Long-term effects of fertilization and manuring on productivity and soil biological properties under rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) sequence in Mollisols

Babita Bhatt; Ramesh Chandra; Shri Ram; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Long-term effects of chemical fertilizers and farmyard manure (FYM) in rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system were monitored for two consecutive years after 38 and 39 years on productivity and soil biological properties of Mollisols. The study encompasses varying chemical fertilizer levels of optimum fertilizer rate (120, 26 and 37 kg ha−1 N, P and K, respectively) for both the crops. The treatments were application of 50% NPK, 100% NPK, 150% NPK, 100% NPK + hand weeding (HW), 100% NPK + Zn, 100% NP, 100% N, 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1, 100% NPK(-S) and unfertilized control. The rice and wheat yields were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1. This treatment also gave maximum and significantly more counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil than all the other treatments after crop harvest. The soil microbial biomass C (410.0 and 407.5 µg g−1) and N (44.53 and 48.30 µg g−1) after rice and wheat, respectively, were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1, which were significantly higher over all the other treatments. The activities of soil enzymes like dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, arylsulphatase and urease and CO2 evolution rate with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1 were also found significantly higher over the other treatments. Fertilizer treatments with 100% NPK and 150% NPK were comparable and significantly better than application of 50% NPK, 100% N, 100% NP and 100% NPK(-S) in various studied soil biological properties. Integrated use of 100% NPK with FYM sustained the higher yields and soil biological properties under rice–wheat cropping system in Mollisols. Application of Zn and hand weeding with 100% NPK were found better over 100% NPK alone in rice and wheat productivity. Imbalanced use of chemical fertilizers had the harmful effect on soil biological health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice and wheat yields were highest under NPK plus manure.

Treatment
100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
rice and wheat yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice and wheat yields were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure increased soil bacteria, fungi and actinomycete counts relative to other treatments.

Treatment
100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1e1
Outcome
counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soile0
Direction
significantly moree0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also gave maximum and significantly more counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil than all the other treatments after crop harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–828 · show in text ↑
e1

“The rice and wheat yields were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–670 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass C was highest under NPK plus manure.

Treatment
100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
soil microbial biomass Ce0
Direction
higheste0
Value
410.0 and 407.5 µg g−1e0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil microbial biomass C (410.0 and 407.5 µg g−1) and N (44.53 and 48.30 µg g−1) after rice and wheat, respectively, were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1, which were significantly higher over all the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microbial biomass N was highest under NPK plus manure.

Treatment
100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44.53 and 48.30 µg g−1e0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil microbial biomass C (410.0 and 407.5 µg g−1) and N (44.53 and 48.30 µg g−1) after rice and wheat, respectively, were highest with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1, which were significantly higher over all the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil enzyme activities and CO2 evolution were higher with NPK plus manure.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1e0
Outcome
activities of soil enzymes like dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, arylsulphatase and urease and CO2 evolution ratee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of soil enzymes like dehydrogenase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, arylsulphatase and urease and CO2 evolution rate with 100% NPK + 15 t FYM ha−1 were also found significantly higher over the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full and 150% NPK were comparable and better than lower or imbalanced fertilizer treatments for soil biological properties.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
100% NPK and 150% NPKe0
Outcome
soil biological propertiese0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Comparator
50% NPK, 100% N, 100% NP and 100% NPK(-S)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilizer treatments with 100% NPK and 150% NPK were comparable and significantly better than application of 50% NPK, 100% N, 100% NP and 100% NPK(-S) in various studied soil biological properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa)–wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Zn and hand weeding to full NPK improved rice and wheat productivity.

Treatment
Zn and hand weeding with 100% NPKe0
Outcome
rice and wheat productivitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
100% NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn and hand weeding with 100% NPK were found better over 100% NPK alone in rice and wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1741 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 88 positive, 11 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.