Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropped cowpea yields were decreased by 26 per cent under the tall maize variety.

A claim from Influence of height of maize variety on the productivity of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropped cowpea yields were decreased by 26 per cent under the tall maize variety.

Treatment
Intercroppede1
Outcome
cowpea yieldse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
26e1
Qualifier
talle1
Comparator
monoculture systemse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monoculture systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–605
e1

“Intercropped cowpea yields were decreased by 29 and 26 per cent, respectively, under the short and tall maize varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–726

Title

Influence of height of maize variety on the productivity of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

YA Abayomi Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 2000. doi:10.4314/gjas.v33i2.1871

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-7b1dff9a3d41a5f3f833685af786a23b524d72c8697d1418281da3163d63015f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.