Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chisel plowing gave a significantly higher sorghum grain yield in the first season and in the combined analysis.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AND SORGHUM GRAIN YIELD IN VERTISOLS OF DRYLAND FARMING NORTHERN GEDARIF · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chisel plowing gave a significantly higher sorghum grain yield in the first season and in the combined analysis.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
chisel plowinge3
Outcome
sorghum grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
in the first season and combined analysise3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SORGHUM GRAIN YIELD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–77
e3

“Zero tillage and chisel plowing resulte d in a significantly higher sorghum grain yield in the first season and combine d analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–823

Title

INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE METHODS ON SOIL MOISTURE CONTENT AND SORGHUM GRAIN YIELD IN VERTISOLS OF DRYLAND FARMING NORTHERN GEDARIF

Lotfie A. Yousif; Elwaleed Mohamed Elamin; Saeed B Saeed Journal of Science and Technology 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-7b72c5b2abc5aa8aa3634da5569a44dee53523abaa417ce650e41ca646359440 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Conservation agriculture gave higher sorghum yield than conventional farming.

    Selected Farming Systems for Improving Crop Production and RainWater Productivity in Semi-Arid Zone, Sudan · 2023 · compared with CF

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Sorghum grain yields declined with each increase in tillage intensity in the second rotation cycle (NT > MT > CT).

    Cropping Frequencies to Sustain Long‐Term Conservation Tillage Systems · 1990

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Flat bed planting produced the lowest grain yields except on unfertilized Entisols.

    Grain Yield Response of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to Tied Ridges and Planting Methods on Entisols and Vertisols of Alemaya Area, Eastern Ethiopian Highlands · 2003

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    With adequate moisture, zero-tillage depressed yields by up to 40% compared with conventional practice.

    No-tillage as compared to tillage practices in dry-land farming of a semi-arid climate. · 1970 · compared with conventional practice

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage or variety did not significantly influence sorghum grain yield.

    Factoring labour when comparing in situ rainwater harvesting technologies for semi-arid areas of central Tanzania · 2023

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Preplanting compaction significantly reduced sorghum yields.

    Response of Grain Sorghum to Seedbed Compaction1 · 1966

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Annualized production cost was 11%–32% greater for forage sorghum dominated no-till systems than T‐S‐O.

    Nutritive value and net return of forage crop rotations in the central Great Plains · 2023 · compared with T‐S‐O

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Sorghum yield was not reduced by tillage delayed 10 days.

    Influence of Weed Growth and Tillage Interval During Fallow on Water Storage, Soil Nitrates, and Yield · 1979

    Opposite direction

114 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.