Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Dipping cutting bases in 1000 mg L-1 IBA significantly improved vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height and diameter.

A claim from IMPACT OF AUXIN AND NUMBER OF BUDS LEFT IN CUTTINGS FOR THE ROOTING AND GROWTH OF GRAPE TRANSPLANTS OF CV. HALWANI AND KAMALI · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dipping cutting bases in 1000 mg L-1 IBA significantly improved vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height and diameter.

Taxon
GRAPEt0
Treatment
IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentratione0
Outcome
vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diametere0
Direction
superioritye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99
e0

“Dipping the cutting bases of the cultivars with IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentration resulted in significant superiority in the percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weight, vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diameter, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–754

Title

IMPACT OF AUXIN AND NUMBER OF BUDS LEFT IN CUTTINGS FOR THE ROOTING AND GROWTH OF GRAPE TRANSPLANTS OF CV. HALWANI AND KAMALI

S. A. Hussein; Sh. A. Zaili Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2025. doi:10.32649/ajas.2025.154182.1445

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-7bbb4baefa48ab2a5960ce7fa4a3e90826713acf18ca427ffcbcfe8025f762b5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.