Abstract
This study investigated the effect of treating cuttings with auxin indole butyric acid (IBA) at three concentrations of 0, 500, and 1000 mg L-1 by rapid immersion for 10 seconds. The number of buds on the cuttings were determined at three levels (3, 5 and 7 bud cutting-1) on the rooting and vegetative growth of grape transplants of Halwani and Kamali cultivars. Each cultivar had 135 cuttings for a total of 270 cuttings for both cultivars. Dipping the cutting bases of the cultivars with IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentration resulted in significant superiority in the percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weight, vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diameter, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content. The auxin treatment did not affect the leaves nitrogen content for both cultivars. The 3- and 5-buds cutting-1 of the Halwani grape cultivar had a significant effect on the rooted cuttings, reaching 95.00 and 95.56%, respectively, while the 5-bud cuttings of the Kamali cultivar significantly increased the number of rooted cuttings and total nitrogen in the leaves at 99.33 and 2.53%, respectively. Cuttings of 5 buds from both cultivars had a significant effect on their average root length, dry weight of the root and vegetative system, average transplant height, number of leaves, leaf area and leaf content of chlorophyll. However, average transplant diameters for both cultivars were not affected by the number of buds left on the cuttings
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Dipping cutting bases in 1000 mg L-1 IBA significantly improved percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length and root dry weight.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentratione0
- Outcome
- percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weighte0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Dipping the cutting bases of the cultivars with IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentration resulted in significant superiority in the percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weight, vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diameter, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content”
Claim · model-written summary
Dipping cutting bases in 1000 mg L-1 IBA significantly improved vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height and diameter.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentratione0
- Outcome
- vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diametere0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Dipping the cutting bases of the cultivars with IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentration resulted in significant superiority in the percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weight, vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diameter, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content”
Claim · model-written summary
Dipping cutting bases in 1000 mg L-1 IBA significantly improved number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Treatment
- IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentratione0
- Outcome
- number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- superioritye0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Dipping the cutting bases of the cultivars with IBA in 1000 mg L-1 concentration resulted in significant superiority in the percentage of rooted cuttings, average root length, root dry weight, vegetative system dry weight, average transplant height, diameter, number of leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content”
Claim · model-written summary
The auxin treatment did not affect leaf nitrogen content in either cultivar.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“The auxin treatment did not affect the leaves nitrogen content for both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
In Halwani, cuttings with 3 buds had a significant effect on rooted cuttings, reaching 95.00%.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- Halwanie0
- Treatment
- The 3- and 5-buds cutting-1e0
- Outcome
- rooted cuttingse0
- Value
- 95.00e0
- Qualifier
- 3-e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“The 3- and 5-buds cutting-1 of the Halwani grape cultivar had a significant effect on the rooted cuttings, reaching 95.00 and 95.56%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In Halwani, cuttings with 5 buds had a significant effect on rooted cuttings, reaching 95.56%.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- Halwanie0
- Treatment
- The 3- and 5-buds cutting-1e0
- Outcome
- rooted cuttingse0
- Value
- 95.56%e0
- Qualifier
- 5-budse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“The 3- and 5-buds cutting-1 of the Halwani grape cultivar had a significant effect on the rooted cuttings, reaching 95.00 and 95.56%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In Kamali, 5-bud cuttings significantly increased the number of rooted cuttings (99.33).
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- Kamalie0
- Treatment
- 5-bud cuttingse0
- Outcome
- number of rooted cuttingse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 99.33e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“the 5-bud cuttings of the Kamali cultivar significantly increased the number of rooted cuttings and total nitrogen in the leaves at 99.33 and 2.53%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
In Kamali, 5-bud cuttings significantly increased total nitrogen in the leaves (2.53%).
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- Kamalie0
- Organ / stage
- leavese0
- Treatment
- 5-bud cuttingse0
- Outcome
- total nitrogene0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.53%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“the 5-bud cuttings of the Kamali cultivar significantly increased the number of rooted cuttings and total nitrogen in the leaves at 99.33 and 2.53%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings of 5 buds had a significant effect on average root length and dry weight of the root and vegetative system in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- both cultivarse0
- Treatment
- Cuttings of 5 budse0
- Outcome
- average root length, dry weight of the root and vegetative systeme0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Cuttings of 5 buds from both cultivars had a significant effect on their average root length, dry weight of the root and vegetative system, average transplant height, number of leaves, leaf area and leaf content of chlorophyll”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings of 5 buds had a significant effect on average transplant height, number of leaves and leaf area in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- both cultivarse0
- Treatment
- Cuttings of 5 budse0
- Outcome
- average transplant height, number of leaves, leaf areae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Cuttings of 5 buds from both cultivars had a significant effect on their average root length, dry weight of the root and vegetative system, average transplant height, number of leaves, leaf area and leaf content of chlorophyll”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuttings of 5 buds had a significant effect on leaf chlorophyll content in both cultivars.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- both cultivarse0
- Treatment
- Cuttings of 5 budse0
- Outcome
- leaf content of chlorophylle0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“Cuttings of 5 buds from both cultivars had a significant effect on their average root length, dry weight of the root and vegetative system, average transplant height, number of leaves, leaf area and leaf content of chlorophyll”
Claim · model-written summary
Average transplant diameter was not affected by the number of buds left on the cuttings in either cultivar.
- Taxon
- GRAPEt0
- Material
- both cultivarse0
- Treatment
- number of budse0
- Outcome
- average transplant diameterse0
- Direction
- not affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“GRAPE TRANSPLANTS”
e0“average transplant diameters for both cultivars were not affected by the number of buds left on the cuttings”
The same questions in other papers
indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →class · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
pruning · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.