Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Split copper application yielded higher grain nitrogen content than early boating or tillering application.

A claim from Response of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant Grown on Light Textured Soil to Copper Foliar Application Under Different Rates of Nitrogen Fertilization · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split copper application yielded higher grain nitrogen content than early boating or tillering application.

Treatment
Cu applied in two split doses at tillering + early boating stagese0
Outcome
N contents of wheat grainse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Cu applied at early boating stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N contents of wheat grains were increased with timing of Cu applications in the order: Cu applied in two split doses at tillering + early boating stages> Cu applied at early boating stage ≥ Cu applied at tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2278–2497

Title

Response of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Plant Grown on Light Textured Soil to Copper Foliar Application Under Different Rates of Nitrogen Fertilization

M. A., Abd EL-Aziz; Omar, E. H.; Ragab, M. M. S.; et al. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2008. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2008.3187

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-7eeccf2372e7bda1bf6c5f39b69bf8744127004cc2274d3466ffb2346985dd51 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.