Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat straw yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Irrigation levelse5
- Outcome
- straw yielde3
- Qualifier
- in both seasonse5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to study the effect of planting methods and irrigation treatments on yield of wheat and irrigation water management”
e3“Planting methods had a significant effect on straw yield in first season, and a highly significant effect in second season”
e5“irrigation levels had non-significant effect, and the interaction between planting method and Irrigation levels in both seasons”
Title
Effect of Irrigation Water Management on Wheat Yield
S. Sorour; A. Ragab; H. Abdel-Raheem; et al. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2016. doi:10.21608/jssae.2016.39658
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Planting methods had no significant effect on wheat grain yield in the first season.
- Intervention effect Planting methods had a highly significant effect on wheat grain yield in the second season.
- Intervention effect Planting methods had a significant effect on wheat straw yield in the first season.
- Intervention effect Planting methods had a highly significant effect on wheat straw yield in the second season.
- Intervention effect Irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.
- Intervention effect The interaction between planting methods and irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.
- Intervention effect The interaction between planting method and irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat straw yield.
- Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the highest seasonal water applied in the first and second seasons.
- Intervention effect Bed drill with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the lowest seasonal water applied.
- Intervention effect Bed drill and bed hill with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the highest water saving.
- Intervention effect Flat drill and flat hill with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the lowest water saving.
- Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the highest water consumptive use.
- Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the lowest water consumptive use.
- Intervention effect Bed drill and bed hill under 0-20 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the highest mean irrigation water productivity in both seasons.
- Intervention effect Bed hill with 0-20 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the maximum water productivity in the first and second seasons.
- Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with 0-60 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the minimum water productivity in the first and second seasons.