Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The interaction between planting methods and irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation Water Management on Wheat Yield · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: Planting methods and irrigation levelse4
Outcome: grain yielde2
Qualifier: in both seasonse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1
“to study the effect of planting methods and irrigation treatments on yield of wheat and irrigation water management”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–366

e2
“Planting methods had non-significant effect on grain yield in the first season and a highly significant effect in the second season”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1314

e4
“irrigation levels had non-significant effect and interaction between both Planting methods and irrigation levels in both seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1450

Title

Effect of Irrigation Water Management on Wheat Yield

S. Sorour; A. Ragab; H. Abdel-Raheem; et al. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2016. doi:10.21608/jssae.2016.39658

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Planting methods had no significant effect on wheat grain yield in the first season.
Intervention effect Planting methods had a highly significant effect on wheat grain yield in the second season.
Intervention effect Planting methods had a significant effect on wheat straw yield in the first season.
Intervention effect Planting methods had a highly significant effect on wheat straw yield in the second season.
Intervention effect Irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat straw yield.
Intervention effect The interaction between planting method and irrigation levels had no significant effect on wheat straw yield.
Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the highest seasonal water applied in the first and second seasons.
Intervention effect Bed drill with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the lowest seasonal water applied.
Intervention effect Bed drill and bed hill with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the highest water saving.
Intervention effect Flat drill and flat hill with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the lowest water saving.
Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-60 cm soil depth gave the highest water consumptive use.
Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with irrigation scheduling to 0-20 cm soil depth gave the lowest water consumptive use.
Intervention effect Bed drill and bed hill under 0-20 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the highest mean irrigation water productivity in both seasons.
Intervention effect Bed hill with 0-20 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the maximum water productivity in the first and second seasons.
Intervention effect Flat broadcasting with 0-60 cm soil-depth scheduling gave the minimum water productivity in the first and second seasons.

Record rev-8e72400a8608ed8fccecca5478a4d915bee4654f59bdf919f46515ae6bede033 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

positive
Reducing DASM from 70% to 40% at irrigation and increasing N or K rates significantly increased spike number m-2, grain number per spike and 1000-grain weight in wheat.
Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizers on wheat productivity under different soil moisture contents · 2021 · compared with 70%
Opposite directionCites this paper
no effect
Full irrigation W2 (40 cm) gave insignificant increases in spike number, spike length and kernel number compared with W1.
The Mutual Effect of Withholding Irrigation at Some Growth Stages and Potassium Fertilizer on Yield and Water Productivity of Wheat · 2016 · compared with full irrigation (W1)
Same directionCites this paper
positive
Grain yield was higher under sufficient water supply than under drought stress in all cultivars
Moderate Drought Stress Affected Root Growth and Grain Yield in Old, Modern and Newly Released Cultivars of Winter Wheat · 2017 · compared with drought stress
Opposite direction
positive
In field trials, Trichoderma koningii applied to the seed furrow increased spring wheat yield by 65% at Mt. Vernon, WA.
Combination ofTrichoderma koningiiwith Fluorescent Pseudomonads for Control of Take-all on Wheat · 1996
Opposite direction
positive
One third full irrigation significantly increased wheat yield.
Stabilizing Rainfed Wheat Yields with Supplemental Irrigation and Nitrogen in a Mediterranean Climate · 1998
Opposite direction
positive
Doubling irrigated land by 2035 with crop intensification could increase wheat production and make Egypt self-sufficient in the near future.
Can Egypt become self-sufficient in wheat? · 2018
Opposite direction
positive
irrigation at jointing and at jointing plus anthesis improved grain yield by an average of 12.79 and 18.65% across three cropping seasons, respectively, compared with no irrigation
Effect of irrigation and nitrogen application on grain amino acid composition and protein quality in winter wheat · 2017 · compared with no irrigation
Opposite direction
positive
Each additional 60 mm irrigation increased simulated crop yield by 1.2 t ha −1.
Modeling Wheat and Maize Productivity as Affected by Climate Variation and Irrigation Supply in North China Plain · 2010
Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results