Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pearl millet intercropping reduced soybean yield 58.3%.

A claim from Soybean–Cereal Intercropping Systems as Influenced by Nitrogen Nutrition · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearl millet intercropping reduced soybean yield 58.3%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
intercropping with maize, sorghum and pearl millete0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
58.3%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean yield reduced by 33.6, 37.9 and 58.3% due to intercropping with maize, sorghum and pearl millet, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–970

Title

Soybean–Cereal Intercropping Systems as Influenced by Nitrogen Nutrition

J. Layek; B. G. Shivakumar; D. S. Rana; et al. Agronomy Journal 2014. doi:10.2134/agronj13.0521

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-87f60f5402c23b950f696d3a9bee95a23f13a5f642f2c49ba6c3e1622d6098dc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Cenchrus americanus · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Sorghum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Zea mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 58 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.