Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sulfur fertilization promoted tillering.

A claim from Nitrogen and sulfur Association: Effects on Yield Components and Physical Attributes of Wheat Seeds · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilization promoted tillering.

Treatment
Sulfur fertilizatione0
Outcome
tilleringe0
Direction
promotese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfur fertilization promotes tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1286
t0

“Wheat Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99

Title

Nitrogen and sulfur Association: Effects on Yield Components and Physical Attributes of Wheat Seeds

João R. Pimentel; Cristian Troyjack; Ítala T. P. Dubal; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2019. doi:10.5539/jas.v11n12p50

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-89ed0099f7dca70455537f55b0b7297ff9782504a3f5900c7a316879d2d3457e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Sulphur dusting did not prevent kernel smudge in maturing crops.

    The "BLACK-POINT" OR "KERNEL SMUDGE" DISEASE OF CEREALS · 1938

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Radiation use efficiency was conservative with sulphur fertilization.

    Productivity of wheat/faba bean intercropping systems in response to sulphur fertilization and seed rate under contrasting management conditions · 2012

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Bioactive sulfur coated urea at 130 kg N ha -1 significantly increased wheat leaf area index to 5.67.

    Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers enhance growth, yield, NUE in wheat crop and reduce nitrogen losses under an arid environment · 2021

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Sulfur supply raised sulfur uptake per unit root mass, area and length at Z39 and Z51.

    Sulfur affects root growth and improves nitrogen recovery and internal efficiency in wheat · 2017 · compared with −S

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Intensive sulfur nutrition, especially 6 mM S, partly increased biomass in nickel exposed wheat.

    Macronutrient composition of nickel-treated wheat under different sulfur concentrations in the nutrient solution · 2015

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Nitrogen fertilizer applied without sulfur significantly increased optimum dough work input in laboratory and industrial tests.

    Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Commercial‐Scale Wheat Quality and Mixing Requirements · 2000

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  7. positive
    Sulfur increased wheat shoot biomass.

    Comparison of Organic and Inorganic Amendments for Enhancing Soil Lead Phytoextraction by Wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) · 2010

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Sulphur alone significantly increased straw dry weight, from 2.53 to 3.86%.

    Effects of sulphur and zinc applications on growth and nutrition of bread wheat in calcareous clay loam soil · 2012

    Same direction

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this claim · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight.

    Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Gibberellic acid reduced root dry weight of wheat, unless applied to the shoots in a lanolin paste.

    The plant‐growth‐promoting properties of gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus gibberella fujikuroi · 1954

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Stagnant solution reduced Gamenya shoot fresh weight by 21%.

    Tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum cvs Gamenya and Kite) and triticale (Triticosecale cv. Muir) to waterlogging · 1992 · compared with aerated plants

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Urea fertilizer impurities such as biuret do not account for the adverse effect on seed germination in soil.

    Evidence that the adverse effect of urea fertilizer on seed germination in soil is due to ammonia formed through hydrolysis of urea by soil urease · 1989

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Applying more N fertilizer did not improve DM accumulation in winter wheat.

    Understanding Dry Matter and Nitrogen Accumulation with Time-Course for High-Yielding Wheat Production in China · 2013

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly change rooting pattern.

    Root Development of Winter Wheat as Related to Tillage Practice in Western Nebraska1 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen fertiliser application did not affect wheat rooting depth.

    Rooting depth of wheat in the Victorian Mallee · 1990

    Opposite direction

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.