Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer applied without sulfur significantly increased optimum dough work input in laboratory and industrial tests.

A claim from Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Commercial‐Scale Wheat Quality and Mixing Requirements · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer applied without sulfur significantly increased optimum dough work input in laboratory and industrial tests.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
Otanee0
Treatment
nitrogen (N) fertilizer was applied without sulfur fertilizer (S)e0
Outcome
optimum mechanical dough development (MDD) work input (WI)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using the bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) cultivar Otane. Wheat flours from both trials were evaluated for physical dough properties under laboratory conditions and also under industrial conditions in the second trial. The laboratory and industrial optimum mechanical dough development (MDD) work input (WI) significantly increased when nitrogen (N) fertilizer was applied without sulfur fertilizer (S) during crop cultivation. With combined N and S fertilization, laboratory and industrial WI remained close to levels for grain grown without fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–692

Title

Effects of Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization on Commercial‐Scale Wheat Quality and Mixing Requirements

A. R. Wooding; S. Kavale; A. J. Wilson; et al. Cereal Chemistry 2000. doi:10.1094/cchem.2000.77.6.791

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-aa2139e44b3f9506fc0a88cf05bef64cb994d18416f69140c20b4404992e2e05 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this claim · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

542 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

746 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.