Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Egan soil moisture did not differ significantly among tillage systems.

A claim from Tillage and nitrogen effects on growth, nitrogen content, and yield of corn · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egan soil moisture did not differ significantly among tillage systems.

Treatment
tillage systemse0
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Setting
Egan soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the Egan soil, there were no significant differences in soil moisture content among tillage systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1311
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–75

Title

Tillage and nitrogen effects on growth, nitrogen content, and yield of corn

W. B. Gordon; D. H. Rickerl; D. R. Sorensen; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1993. doi:10.1080/00103629309368812

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8a2a4d63db5e56e99c5bcce9d4209ecf75b3169088eb9b7d5dcb4a3ae70e5ae8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

tillage · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.