Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Insecticide dust bands around the trunks satisfactorily controlled larvae.

A claim from Control of the Indian Gipsy Moth, (Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple · 1982

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide dust bands around the trunks satisfactorily controlled larvae.

Treatment
5 per cent dust formulation of insecticides like BHC, aldrin, DDT, heptachlor, chlordane or carbaryle0
Interactor
Lymantria Obfuscata Walkert0pest
Outcome
control of the larvaee0
Direction
satisfactory controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 5 per cent dust formulation of insecticides like BHC, aldrin, DDT, heptachlor, chlordane or carbaryl in 30 cm wide and 0.5 cm thick bands on the ground around the trunk of the trees or spraying the trees with 0.05 per cent emulsion of insecticides like diazinon, endosulfan, methyl parathion, dichlorvas, quinalphos or fenitrothion resulted in satisfactory control of the larvae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–846
t0

“Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–71

Title

Control of the Indian Gipsy Moth, (Lymantria Obfuscata Walker) on Apple

Barkha Gupta Indian Journal of Horticulture 1982

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8ba61cfdcb4f2a0247b6fa36120803e48e2f3ae6c909ce96946a220e58981a17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

carbaryl · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

insecticide · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.