Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed priming improved plant vigour and drought tolerance.

A claim from ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN SEMI-ARID AGRICULTURE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEA IN INDIA USING PARTICIPATORY METHODS · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming improved plant vigour and drought tolerance.

Taxon
MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEAt0
Treatment
seed primingt1
Outcome
more vigorous plants, better drought tolerancee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Direct benefits in all three crops included faster emergence, better stands and a lower incidence of re-sowing, more vigorous plants, better drought tolerance, earlier flowering, earlier harvest and higher grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1541
t0

“MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–101
t1

“SEED PRIMING”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–20

Title

ON-FARM SEED PRIMING IN SEMI-ARID AGRICULTURE: DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION IN MAIZE, RICE AND CHICKPEA IN INDIA USING PARTICIPATORY METHODS

D. Harris; A. Joshi; P. A. Khan; et al. Experimental Agriculture 1999. doi:10.1017/s0014479799001027

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-8bbaffc37e03e294c90e9da1f2d86863d3a02e6078d604e143507523b5e74760 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

seed treatment · tolerance: abiotic · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.