Paper · 2021 · Silicon

Silicon Seed Priming Combined with Foliar Spray of Sulfur Regulates Photosynthetic and Antioxidant Systems to Confer Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)

Muhammad Farman; Fahim Nawaz; Sadia Majeed; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The present study evaluated the effect of silicon (Si) seed priming and sulfur (S) foliar spray on drought tolerance of two contrasting maize hybrids viz. drought tolerant Hi-Corn 11 and susceptible P-1574. The maize seeds were primed with (3 mM Na 2 SiO 3 ) or without Si (hydropriming) and later sown in pots filled with sandy loam soil. Drought stress (25–30% water holding capacity or WHC) was initiated at cob development stage (V5) for two weeks, whereas the well-watered plants were grown at 65–70% WHC. On appearance of drought symptoms, foliar spray of S was done using 0.5% and 1.0% (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , whereas water spray was used as a control. The drought-stressed plants were grown for further two weeks at 25–30% WHC before the final harvest. The results showed a marked effect of Si seed priming and foliar S spray on biomass, physiological and enzymatic processes as well as macronutrient concentrations of maize. In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions. Also, Si + S application stimulated the activity of catalase (45%), guaiacol peroxidase (38%) and superoxide dismutase (55%), and improved NPK concentrations (40–63%) under water limitations. Our results suggest that Si seed priming + foliar spray of S is more effective than the individual application of these nutrients to enhance drought tolerance in maize.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
leaf relative water contente1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
25%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in chlorophyll a content (56%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
chlorophyll a contente1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
56%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in carotenoids (26%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
carotenoidse1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
26%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in photosynthetic rate (64%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
64%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in stomatal conductance (56%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
56%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with S foliar spray gave the highest increase in intercellular CO2 concentration (48%) under water deficit compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + S foliar spraye1
Outcome
intercellular CO 2 concentratione1
Direction
highest increasee1
Value
48%e1
Qualifier
under water deficit conditionse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison to control, the highest increase in leaf relative water content (25%), chlorophyll a content (56%), carotenoids (26%), photosynthetic rate (64%), stomatal conductance (56%) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (48%) was observed by Si seed priming + S foliar spray (Si + S) under water deficit conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si + S application stimulated catalase activity by 45%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si + S applicatione2
Outcome
activity of catalasee2
Direction
stimulatede2
Value
45%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Si + S application stimulated the activity of catalase (45%), guaiacol peroxidase (38%) and superoxide dismutase (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si + S application stimulated guaiacol peroxidase activity by 38%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si + S applicatione2
Outcome
guaiacol peroxidasee2
Direction
stimulatede2
Value
38%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Si + S application stimulated the activity of catalase (45%), guaiacol peroxidase (38%) and superoxide dismutase (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si + S application stimulated superoxide dismutase activity by 55%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si + S applicatione2
Outcome
superoxide dismutasee2
Direction
stimulatede2
Value
55%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Si + S application stimulated the activity of catalase (45%), guaiacol peroxidase (38%) and superoxide dismutase (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si + S application improved NPK concentrations by 40-63% under water limitation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si + S applicatione2
Outcome
NPK concentrationse3
Direction
improvede3
Value
40–63%e3
Qualifier
under water limitationse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Si + S application stimulated the activity of catalase (45%), guaiacol peroxidase (38%) and superoxide dismutase (55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
e3

“improved NPK concentrations (40–63%) under water limitations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si seed priming with foliar spray of S is more effective than individual nutrient application for enhancing drought tolerance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Si seed priming + foliar spray of Se4
Outcome
drought tolerancee4
Direction
more effectivee4
Comparator
individual application of these nutrientse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“Si seed priming + foliar spray of S is more effective than the individual application of these nutrients to enhance drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1606 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

silicon atom · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

seed treatment · physiology: gas exchange · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · tolerance: abiotic · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.