Paper · 2016 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

The effect of the silicon and aluminum interaction on the physiological parameters of maize.

Kourosh Delavar; Faezeh Ghanati; Hassan Zare‐Maivan; et al.

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Aluminum and silicon are usually abundant in the soil and most plants are affected by them. Therefore, in the present study, the effect of the interaction of Si (0 and 2 mM) and low concentrations of Al (0, 50, 100, and 150 µM) on some physiological parameters of Zea mays var. Merit were investigated and were analyzed by cluster heatmaps for better interpretation of results. Results showed that application of Al increased the fresh and dry weight of maize, and plant growth rate was increased by increasing Al concentration in treatments. However adding Si to Al-treated plants had no effects on the maize plant biomass. Pigments content of plant increased and decreased in Al treatments and Ai + Si treatments, respectively. Also, both Al and Si had negative effect on the activity of antioxidant enzyme and proline content of maize in general. Aluminum treatments mostly enhanced the K and Fe content of plants, but decreased Mg and Ca content. However, adding Si to Al-treated plants reversed this trend. Apparently, Ai and Si have an antagonist effect on the mineral content of the plant. Results of the present study suggested that increasing of the plant pigment content contributes to the enhancing of plant growth rate, and the K content of the shoot in maize has an important role in increasing the plant growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al application increased maize fresh.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that application of Al increased the fresh and dry weight of maize, and plant growth rate was increased by increasing Al concentration in treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al application increased maize dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that application of Al increased the fresh and dry weight of maize, and plant growth rate was increased by increasing Al concentration in treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al application increased maize plant growth rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
plant growth ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that application of Al increased the fresh and dry weight of maize, and plant growth rate was increased by increasing Al concentration in treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Si to Al treated maize did not change biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
adding Si to Al-treated plantse0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
no effectse0
Comparator
Al-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However adding Si to Al-treated plants had no effects on the maize plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize pigment content increased under Al treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Al treatmentse0
Outcome
Pigments contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigments content of plant increased and decreased in Al treatments and Ai + Si treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize pigment content decreased under Ai + Si treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ai + Si treatmentse0
Outcome
Pigments contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigments content of plant increased and decreased in Al treatments and Ai + Si treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al reduced maize antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzyme and proline contente0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, both Al and Si had negative effect on the activity of antioxidant enzyme and proline content of maize in general.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Si reduced maize antioxidant enzyme activity and proline content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzyme and proline contente0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, both Al and Si had negative effect on the activity of antioxidant enzyme and proline content of maize in general.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum treatments enhanced maize K and Fe content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Aluminum treatmentse0
Outcome
K and Fe contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum treatments mostly enhanced the K and Fe content of plants, but decreased Mg and Ca content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum treatments decreased maize Mg and Ca content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Aluminum treatmentse0
Outcome
Mg and Ca contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum treatments mostly enhanced the K and Fe content of plants, but decreased Mg and Ca content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Si reversed the Al associated mineral content pattern in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
adding Si to Al-treated plantse0
Outcome
this trende0
Direction
reversede0
Comparator
Al-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, adding Si to Al-treated plants reversed this trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest higher pigment content contributes to enhanced maize growth rate.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
plant pigment contente0
Outcome
plant growth ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the present study suggested that increasing of the plant pigment content contributes to the enhancing of plant growth rate, and the K content of the shoot in maize has an important role in increasing the plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1325 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest shoot K content contributes to increasing maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
shoote0
Compound
K contente0
Outcome
plant growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of the present study suggested that increasing of the plant pigment content contributes to the enhancing of plant growth rate, and the K content of the shoot in maize has an important role in increasing the plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1325 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 7 positive, 35 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

aluminium atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

aluminium atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 7 positive, 15 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

aluminium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.