Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Magnesium supplied up to 6 hours after aluminum exposure maintained normal soybean root growth.

A claim from Timing, location and crop species influence the magnitude of amelioration of aluminum toxicity by magnesium · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium supplied up to 6 hours after aluminum exposure maintained normal soybean root growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Mg up to 6 h after root exposition to Ale0
Outcome
soybean root growthe0
Direction
maintaine0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Supplying Mg up to 6 h after root exposition to Al was sufficient to maintain normal soybean root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1297

Title

Timing, location and crop species influence the magnitude of amelioration of aluminum toxicity by magnesium

Ivo Ribeiro Silva; Tarcísio Fernando Cortes Corrêa; Roberto Ferreira Novais; et al. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 2009. doi:10.1590/s0100-06832009000100007

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-8e71c928b83fa7bbd3a131d7467e279476306c685fae037b79a3cb4ccd8b8f4c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

aluminium atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

44 papers: 16 positive, 28 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    By 138 h soybean root length after six or 18 hours of aluminium stress did not differ significantly from unstressed controls.

    The role of calcium in alleviating aluminium toxicity · 1986 · compared with unstressed control plants

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    At 2 μM aluminium species and 500 μM calcium, taproot elongation and lateral root development were suppressed.

    Calcium amelioration of aluminium toxicity effects on root hair development in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] · 1993

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Aluminum inhibited lateral root length more than tap root length.

    Root Elongation of Soybean Genotypes in Response to Acidity Constraints in a Subsurface Solution Compartment · 2000 · compared with tap roots

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  4. negative
    Combined PEG and Al reduced soybean root and shoot growth.

    Combined Effect of Short-Term Water Deficit Stress and Aluminum Toxicity on Citrate Secretion from Soybean Roots · 2004

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  5. negative
    At 75 µm, aluminum reduced soybean root growth after only 5 min.

    Identification of the Primary Lesion of Toxic Aluminum in Plant Roots  · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Soybean root elongation was severely reduced at Al concentrations of 10 uM or more.

    EFFECTS OF ALUMINUM, OH · 1983

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Aluminum reduced soybean root growth when the aluminum-to-calcium activity ratio exceeded 0.02.

    The Effect of Calcium and Its Relation to Several Cations in Soybean Root Growth · 1970

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Higher aluminum treatments severely impaired soybean shoot growth.

    Effect of Lime and Organic Matter on Soybean Seedlings Grown in Aluminum‐toxic Soil · 1986

    Opposite direction

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

magnesium atom · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Ca and Mg added without Al had little or no effect on soybean root elongation.

    Magnesium is More Efficient than Calcium in Alleviating Aluminum Rhizotoxicity in Soybean and its Ameliorative Effect is not Explained by the Gouy-Chapman-Stern Model · 2001 · compared with background solutions

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Further increase in Mg supply inhibited soybean growth.

    Effects of Rhizobium inoculation and magnesium application on growth and nodulation of soybean (Glycine max L.) · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Magnesium removal for seven periods of 21 to 121 days reduced soybean growth.

    The Effect of Magnesium upon the Growth and the Phosphorus Content of Soybean Plants · 1954

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Magnesium treatments stimulated soybean subsoil root growth less than lime treatments.

    Soybean root growth in relation to ionic composition in magnesium-amended acid subsoils: Implications on root citrate ameliorating aluminum constraints · 2007 · compared with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Soybean root growth in acid soils and aboveground dry matter responses to Mg treatments were less than those to lime treatments.

    LACK OF SOYBEAN ROOT ELONGATION RESPONSES TO MICROMOLAR MAGNESIUM ADDITIONS AND FATE OF ROOT-EXUDED CITRATE IN ACID SUBSOILS · 2010 · compared with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Soybean subsoil root growth responded less to Mg treatments than to lime treatments.

    Soybean Root Growth in Acid Subsoils in Relation to Magnesium Additions and Soil Solution Chemistry · 2006 · compared with lime treatments

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Increasing magnesium reduced soybean first pod height.

    The effect of different irrigation amounts and different doses of phosphorus-magnesium on the yield characteristics of soybean ( glycine max . l.) under the conditions of semi-arid of the Harran Plain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    N, K, Ca, Mg and Fe deficiencies decreased root length and surface area.

    Effects of different element deficiencies on soybean growth and root morphology · 2010

    Opposite direction

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.