Intervention effectmodel-written summary

corn yield was highest under the stated irrigation or tillage practice.

A claim from Effect of Irrigation, Tillage, and Mulch Management on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

corn yield was highest under the stated irrigation or tillage practice.

Treatment
conventional tillage with paddy straw mulche2
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.42 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn yield (1.42 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2336–2358
t0

“Baby Corn (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–112
e1

“7cm depth of irrigation 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after sowing recorded highest fresh corn weight (35.1 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2077
e2

“Conventional tillage with paddy straw mulch @ 4t ha-1 recorded fresh corn weight (36.7 g/plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2238–2334
e3

“WUE recorded the highest (7.58 kg/ha-mm) in 3cm depth of irrigation at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after sowing + conventional tillage with paddy straw mulch @ 4t ha -1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2534–2696
e4

“The return per rupees investment calculated maximum (3.62) in 5cm depth of irrigation at 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3140–3261

Title

Effect of Irrigation, Tillage, and Mulch Management on the Growth, Yield, and Quality of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.)

Asutosh Mishra; Akankshya Mohapatra; Monotosh Das Bairagya; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2025. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i85666

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-8ffb8944ae4956aaf16547179aab4d478511bfb2c6aa25f24fc824c6d057e84b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this claim · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

364 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.