Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping gross returns were Rs. 68400/ha in 2018 and significantly higher than the sole crop.

A claim from Performance of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan l.) based intercropping system with millets under Northern Dry Zone of Karnataka · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping gross returns were Rs. 68400/ha in 2018 and significantly higher than the sole crop.

Taxon
pigeon peaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
pigeon pea + foxtail millet (1:2) based intercropping systeme0
Outcome
gross returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 68400/hae0
Qualifier
2018e0
Comparator
sole crope0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher gross returns (Rs. 70819/ha and Rs. 68400/ha), net returns (Rs. 44419 /ha and Rs. 43600 /ha), and BC ratio (2.93 and 2.84) was recorded in pigeon pea + foxtail millet (1:2) based intercropping system for 2017 and 2018, respectively and this intercropping system is more remunerative over sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–1036

Title

Performance of pigeon pea (Cajanus Cajan l.) based intercropping system with millets under Northern Dry Zone of Karnataka

S A Biradar; Vivek S Devarnavadagi; Shivalingappa Hotkar; et al. Journal of Krishi Vigyan 2020. doi:10.5958/2349-4433.2020.00174.9

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-90298bbfafefe7a7c2b717a935190eb28c9c13b58d337434f7c512cfa6520972 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Setaria italica · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.