Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The highest crude protein, 12.60, was estimated under 180 mm stress with silica fertilizer in irrigation water.

A claim from The role of silica fertilizer on morphological traits of sorghum forage under drought stress · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest crude protein, 12.60, was estimated under 180 mm stress with silica fertilizer in irrigation water.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation watere3
Outcome
crude proteine3
Direction
higheste3
Value
12.60e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116
e3

“The highest amount of crude protein was estimated to be 12.60 from 180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1013

Title

The role of silica fertilizer on morphological traits of sorghum forage under drought stress

Ehsan Rezaei The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2022. doi:10.21162/pakjas/22.1404

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-9283f654071ffbe92d50a3828b495f70da9753882862c08135af1240b5046ed0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.