Paper · 2022 · The Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

The role of silica fertilizer on morphological traits of sorghum forage under drought stress

Ehsan Rezaei

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Evaluate silica fertilizer's effect on the quantitative and qualitative yield of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) under drought stress. A split-plot experiment was implemented in a randomized block design with three replications in two cropping years, 2017-2018, in a farm located in the Varamin - Iran. The treatments included irrigation at three levels of 60, 120 and 180 mm of evaporation from class A's evaporation pan level. The main factor was silica fertilizer as non-consumption (control), foliar application and silica irrigation fertilizer as a secondary factor. Based on the obtained results, the treatment containing total chlorophyll, RWC and stomatal conductance was obtained from the 60 mm evaporation treatment and silica fertilizer use in irrigation water. The use of silica fertilizer as irrigation water reduced the Hydrogen cyanide content by 4%. The highest amount of crude protein was estimated to be 12.60 from 180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation water, which were 19% higher than the control treatment, respectively. The best sorghum dry forage yield was obtained from 60 mm evaporation irrigation and silica irrigation fertilizer with an average of 82.22 ton ha-1 , which was 52% higher than the 180 mm evaporation stress treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll, RWC and stomatal conductance were highest under the 60 mm evaporation irrigation with silica fertilizer in irrigation water.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
60 mm evaporation treatment and silica fertilizer use in irrigation watere1
Outcome
total chlorophyll, RWC and stomatal conductancee1
Direction
higherinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment containing total chlorophyll, RWC and stomatal conductance was obtained from the 60 mm evaporation treatment and silica fertilizer use in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica fertilizer as irrigation water reduced hydrogen cyanide content by 4%.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
silica fertilizer as irrigation watere2
Outcome
Hydrogen cyanide contente2
Direction
reducede2
Value
4%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e2

“The use of silica fertilizer as irrigation water reduced the Hydrogen cyanide content by 4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–868 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest crude protein, 12.60, was estimated under 180 mm stress with silica fertilizer in irrigation water.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation watere3
Outcome
crude proteine3
Direction
higheste3
Value
12.60e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest amount of crude protein was estimated to be 12.60 from 180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1013 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein under 180 mm stress with silica fertilizer in irrigation water was 19% higher than in the control.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation watere3
Outcome
crude proteine3
Direction
highere4
Value
19%e4
Comparator
control treatmente4

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest amount of crude protein was estimated to be 12.60 from 180 mm stress treatment and the use of silica fertilizer in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1013 · show in text ↑
e4

“which were 19% higher than the control treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best dry forage yield, 82.22 ton ha-1, was obtained under 60 mm evaporation irrigation with silica irrigation fertilizer.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
60 mm evaporation irrigation and silica irrigation fertilizere5
Outcome
dry forage yielde5
Direction
beste5
Value
82.22 ton ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“The best sorghum dry forage yield was obtained from 60 mm evaporation irrigation and silica irrigation fertilizer with an average of 82.22 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry forage yield under 60 mm evaporation irrigation with silica irrigation fertilizer was 52% higher than under 180 mm evaporation stress.

Taxon
forage sorghume0
Treatment
60 mm evaporation irrigation and silica irrigation fertilizere5
Outcome
dry forage yielde5
Direction
highere6
Value
52%e6
Comparator
180 mm evaporation stress treatmente6

Verbatim

e0

“forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–116 · show in text ↑
e5

“The best sorghum dry forage yield was obtained from 60 mm evaporation irrigation and silica irrigation fertilizer with an average of 82.22 ton ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1226 · show in text ↑
e6

“which was 52% higher than the 180 mm evaporation stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1294 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · SorghumPositive and negative results

27 papers: 23 positive, 4 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.