Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Effects of Sodic Water Irrigation and Neutralizing Amendments on Physiological, Biochemical, and Nutritional Quality Traits of Fodder Sorghum

Govind Makarana; Rajender Kumar Yadav; Parvender Sheoran; et al.

16
claims
39
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was conducted at two farmers’ fields to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum intervened between the rice-wheat cropping sequences (RWCS) on high residual alkalinity, i.e., residual sodium carbonate (RSC) water irrigation-induced sodic soil. The treatments were comprised of two field sites having different residual alkalinity [RSC ~5 me L−1 (RSC-1) and ~7 me L−1 (RSC-2) water irrigation in main plots, four neutralization strategies, i.e., control/unamended condition (N0), gypsum @ 7.5 t ha−1 (N1), pressmud @ 10 t ha−1 (N2) and gypsum @ 3.75 t ha−1 + pressmud @ 5 t ha−1 (N3) in sub plots and two varietal sequences of RWCS, i.e., salt tolerant varieties (CSR 30 basmati fb KRL 210) and traditionally grown varieties (PB 1121 fb HD 2967) of rice and wheat as sub–sub plots. Sorghum cv. Sugargraze (Advanta Company) was grown after the harvesting of wheat and cut for green fodder before transplanting rice during both years. Sorghum physiological and biochemical traits [relative water content (RWC), total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), photon quantum yield [Y (II)] and K/Na ratio]; fodder quality traits [Crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE)] and productivity [green fodder yield (GFY), dry matter yield, CP yield, EE yield and ash yield) and profitability (gross returns, net returns, benefit–cost ratio) significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1. Proline, total soluble sugar (TSS), total soluble protein (TSP), dry matter (DM), ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP) and acid detergent insoluble CP (ADICP) decreased with increasing RSC of irrigation water. Sodicity neutralization considerably improved sorghum physiological adaptation mechanisms, fodder quality, productivity and profitability. The introduction of summer fodder sorghum between RWCS resulted in additional net returns (NR) (INR 13.64 to 20.79 × 103 ha−1). Our results indicate that pressmud proved a feasible alternative to replace and/or reduce the quantity of gypsum required for neutralization of RSC water irrigation. Growing summer fodder sorghum between RWCS along with neutralization of RSC water irrigation can increase the availability of quality green fodder during lean period and also increase the profitability of the rice-wheat cropping system in high residual alkalinity water irrigation conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1 significantly decreased relative water content, total chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
relative water content (RWC), total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (Pn)e1
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative water content (RWC), total chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate (Pn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1099 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and chlorophyll fluorescence of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm)e3
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e3

“stomatal conductance (gS), transpiration rate (E), chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased photon quantum yield and K/Na ratio of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
photon quantum yield [Y (II)] and K/Na ratioe4
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e4

“photon quantum yield [Y (II)] and K/Na ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased crude protein and ether extract of sorghum fodder.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
Crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE)e5
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e5

“fodder quality traits [Crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased green fodder yield, dry matter yield and CP yield of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
green fodder yield (GFY), dry matter yield, CP yielde6
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e6

“green fodder yield (GFY), dry matter yield, CP yield, EE yield and ash yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased EE yield and ash yield of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
EE yield and ash yielde6
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e6

“green fodder yield (GFY), dry matter yield, CP yield, EE yield and ash yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1394 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water RSC significantly decreased gross returns, net returns and benefit–cost ratio of the sorghum crop.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1e2
Outcome
gross returns, net returns, benefit–cost ratioe7
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased with the increase in irrigation water RSC from 5 to 7 me L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1547 · show in text ↑
e7

“profitability (gross returns, net returns, benefit–cost ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing RSC of irrigation water decreased proline, total soluble sugar and total soluble protein in sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
increasing RSC of irrigation watere2
Outcome
Proline, total soluble sugar (TSS), total soluble protein (TSP)e1
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“Proline, total soluble sugar (TSS), total soluble protein (TSP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1612 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased with increasing RSC of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing RSC of irrigation water decreased dry matter, ash and neutral detergent fibre of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
increasing RSC of irrigation watere2
Outcome
dry matter (DM), ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF)e3
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased with increasing RSC of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1852 · show in text ↑
e3

“dry matter (DM), ash, neutral detergent fibre (NDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing RSC of irrigation water decreased acid detergent fibre, acid detergent lignin and neutral detergent insoluble CP of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
increasing RSC of irrigation watere2
Outcome
acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP)e3
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased with increasing RSC of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1852 · show in text ↑
e3

“acid detergent fibre (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), neutral detergent insoluble CP (NDICP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing RSC of irrigation water decreased acid detergent insoluble CP of sorghum.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
increasing RSC of irrigation watere2
Outcome
acid detergent insoluble CP (ADICP)e3
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“decreased with increasing RSC of irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1803–1852 · show in text ↑
e3

“acid detergent insoluble CP (ADICP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1802 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity neutralisation considerably improved the physiological adaptation mechanisms of sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Sodicity neutralizatione1
Outcome
sorghum physiological adaptation mechanismse1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sodicity neutralization considerably improved sorghum physiological adaptation mechanisms, fodder quality, productivity and profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity neutralisation considerably improved fodder quality, productivity and profitability of sorghum.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume1
Treatment
Sodicity neutralizatione1
Outcome
fodder quality, productivity and profitabilitye1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Sodicity neutralization considerably improved sorghum physiological adaptation mechanisms, fodder quality, productivity and profitability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing summer fodder sorghum between rice and wheat crops gave additional net returns of INR 13.64 to 20.79 × 103 ha−1.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume1
Treatment
introduction of summer fodder sorghum between RWCSe1
Outcome
additional net returns (NR)e1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
INR 13.64 to 20.79 × 103 ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The introduction of summer fodder sorghum between RWCS resulted in additional net returns (NR) (INR 13.64 to 20.79 × 103 ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1993–2119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pressmud was a feasible alternative to gypsum for reducing the quantity of gypsum needed to neutralise RSC irrigation water.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume0
Treatment
pressmude1
Outcome
quantity of gypsum required for neutralizatione1
Direction
reducee1
Comparator
gypsume1

Verbatim

e0

“to assess the production potential and quality of summer fodder sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–119 · show in text ↑
e1

“pressmud proved a feasible alternative to replace and/or reduce the quantity of gypsum required for neutralization of RSC water irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2147–2285 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Growing summer fodder sorghum with RSC neutralisation can increase the availability of quality green fodder in the lean period.

Taxon
summer fodder sorghume1
Outcome
availability of quality green fodder during lean periode1

Verbatim

e1

“Growing summer fodder sorghum between RWCS along with neutralization of RSC water irrigation can increase the availability of quality green fodder during lean period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2287–2452 · show in text ↑

sodium carbonate · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · SorghumPositive and negative results

27 papers: 22 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

irrigation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

131 papers: 94 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.