Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grain yield increased linearly with split urea rate, with a slope varying by year.

A claim from Yield Response to Urea and Controlled-Release Urea as Affected by Water Supply in Tropical Upland Rice · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased linearly with split urea rate, with a slope varying by year.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
increasing N rate in split ureae1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
responded linearlye1
Qualifier
different slope in each yeare1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132
e1

“yield responded linearly to increasing N rate in split urea, but along a different slope in each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–911

Title

Yield Response to Urea and Controlled-Release Urea as Affected by Water Supply in Tropical Upland Rice

M. Kondo; C. V. Singh; R. Agbisit; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2005. doi:10.1081/pln-200047601

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-92d174116a58e8cddceb737ae314822bcf19c843cfd4cfa968b878de7c152564 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this claim · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

2,036 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.