Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Yield Response to Urea and Controlled-Release Urea as Affected by Water Supply in Tropical Upland Rice

M. Kondo; C. V. Singh; R. Agbisit; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nitrogen (N) deficiency and water stress are major abiotic constraints upon the production of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) in tropical Asia. It is, therefore, imperative to quantify the effect of N input on yield and to identify factors affecting the variability of yield response to N under various water supply conditions in order to develop efficient methods of N and crop management. Field experiments were conducted in Bihar, India, over four years to analyze the effect of N rate with split application of soluble urea, and a N sources, split application of soluble urea, and a single application of polyolefin resin-coated controlled-release urea (PCU) on the grain yield, apparent N recovery fraction (ANR), economic N use efficiency (grain yield per N uptake or GYNUE), and root growth. The yield responded linearly to increasing N rate in split urea, but along a different slope in each year. The yield response to N rate was variable among years due to variations in ANR and GYNUE. A significant relationship between the ANR and yield gain by N application across years indicated the importance of improving ANR to maximize the cost-benefit ratio. A comparison of split urea and PCU indicated that ANR could be improved more by the application of PCU than by split urea, especially under a high water supply from rainfall or irrigation. This is probably due to less N having been lost due to runoff and leaching when PCU was used. GYNUE was relatively stable across N treatments, but showed significant year-to-year variation, caused by variations in both the biomass N use efficiency (BNUE) (aboveground dry weight per N uptake) and harvest index (HI) as affected by rainfall conditions. The application of N increased root length from the surface to a below-45 cm depth, which may have contributed to the water exploitation under water stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased linearly with split urea rate, with a slope varying by year.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
increasing N rate in split ureae1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
responded linearlye1
Qualifier
different slope in each yeare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield responded linearly to increasing N rate in split urea, but along a different slope in each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–911 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield response to nitrogen rate varied among years with ANR and GYNUE.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
N ratee1
Outcome
yield response to N ratee1
Direction
variablee1
Qualifier
variations in ANR and GYNUEe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield response to N rate was variable among years due to variations in ANR and GYNUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1001 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ANR and nitrogen-induced yield gain were significantly related across years.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
N applicatione1
Outcome
yield gain by N applicatione1
Qualifier
ANRe1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant relationship between the ANR and yield gain by N application across years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea improved apparent nitrogen recovery more than split urea, especially with high water supply.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
application of PCUe1
Outcome
ANRe1
Direction
improved moree1
Qualifier
high water supply from rainfall or irrigatione1
Comparator
split ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“ANR could be improved more by the application of PCU than by split urea, especially under a high water supply from rainfall or irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1356 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GYNUE was relatively stable across nitrogen treatments.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
N treatmentse1
Outcome
GYNUEe1
Direction
relatively stablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“GYNUE was relatively stable across N treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1499 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GYNUE varied significantly among years.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Outcome
GYNUEe1
Direction
variatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“GYNUE was relatively stable across N treatments, but showed significant year-to-year variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1546 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased root length through depths below 45 cm.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
application of Ne1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
from the surface to a below-45 cm depthe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of N increased root length from the surface to a below-45 cm depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1792 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.