Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Influence of nitrogen and weed management on the productivity of upland rice

Chandra Vir Singh; Bidhan Chandra Ghosh; Bishwa Nath Mittra; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen and weeds are two important factors that influence the productivity of rainfed upland rice ( Oryza sativa L.) in tropical Asia. A low recovery of applied fertilizer N in rainfed uplands is generally associated with high nitrate leaching losses and weed interferences. Field experiments were conducted during the wet seasons of 2002 and 2003 at the research farm of Central Rainfed Upland Rice Research Station, Hazaribag, Jharkhand, India, to determine the response of upland rice to nitrogen applied at 60 kg N ha –1 as different forms of urea (single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release urea, single pre‐plant application of urea supergranules, and split application of prilled urea with or without basal N) against no N application under three weed‐control regimes (unweeded, pre‐emergence application of butachlor at 1.5 kg a.i. ha –1 supplemented with one single hand weeding or two hand weedings). The response of rice to applied N varied greatly among the three weed‐control regimes. Across the different N treatments, the application of 60 kg N ha –1 resulted in a grain‐yield increase above the unfertilized control of only 0.24 Mg ha –1 in unweeded treatments, whereas yields increased by 1.07 Mg ha –1 when butachlor application was supplemented with a single hand weeding and by 1.28 Mg ha –1 with two hand weedings. Among the weed‐control measures, hand weeding twice produced highest grain yield in both years. The comparison of different forms of urea showed that a single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release urea resulted in average grain yields of 1.57 and 1.87 Mg ha –1 compared to 1.32 and 1.30 Mg ha –1 in the case of the recommended practice of split‐applied prilled urea in the years 2002 and 2003, respectively. The highest agronomic N use efficiency of 15–20 kg grain per kg N applied and the highest apparent N recovery of 39%–45% were attained with controlled‐release urea, suggesting that this N form is particularly beneficial for upland‐rice cultivation under variable rainfall conditions, provided weeds are controlled.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha increased grain yield by only 0.24 Mg/ha over the unfertilized control in unweeded plots.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
60 kg N ha –1e1
Outcome
grain‐yield increasee1
Direction
increasee1
Value
0.24 Mg ha –1e1
Qualifier
in unweeded treatmentse1
Comparator
unfertilized controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Across the different N treatments, the application of 60 kg N ha –1 resulted in a grain‐yield increase above the unfertilized control of only 0.24 Mg ha –1 in unweeded treatments, whereas yields increased by 1.07 Mg ha –1 when butachlor application was supplemented with a single hand weeding and by 1.28 Mg ha –1 with two hand weedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha increased grain yield by 1.07 Mg/ha over the unfertilized control when butachlor was supplemented with one hand weeding.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
60 kg N ha –1e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.07 Mg ha –1e1
Qualifier
butachlor application was supplemented with a single hand weedinge1
Comparator
unfertilized controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Across the different N treatments, the application of 60 kg N ha –1 resulted in a grain‐yield increase above the unfertilized control of only 0.24 Mg ha –1 in unweeded treatments, whereas yields increased by 1.07 Mg ha –1 when butachlor application was supplemented with a single hand weeding and by 1.28 Mg ha –1 with two hand weedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg N/ha increased grain yield by 1.28 Mg/ha over the unfertilized control with two hand weedings.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
60 kg N ha –1e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
1.28 Mg ha –1e1
Qualifier
with two hand weedingse1
Comparator
unfertilized controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Across the different N treatments, the application of 60 kg N ha –1 resulted in a grain‐yield increase above the unfertilized control of only 0.24 Mg ha –1 in unweeded treatments, whereas yields increased by 1.07 Mg ha –1 when butachlor application was supplemented with a single hand weeding and by 1.28 Mg ha –1 with two hand weedings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave the highest grain yield in both years among the weed-control measures.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
hand weeding twicee2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in both yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Among the weed‐control measures, hand weeding twice produced highest grain yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, a single pre-plant application of controlled-release urea gave higher average grain yield (1.57 Mg/ha) than split-applied prilled urea.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release ureae3
Outcome
average grain yieldse3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
1.57 and 1.87 Mg ha –1e3
Comparator
split‐applied prilled ureae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“a single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release urea resulted in average grain yields of 1.57 and 1.87 Mg ha –1 compared to 1.32 and 1.30 Mg ha –1 in the case of the recommended practice of split‐applied prilled urea in the years 2002 and 2003, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2003, a single pre-plant application of controlled-release urea gave higher average grain yield (1.87 Mg/ha) than split-applied prilled urea.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release ureae3
Outcome
average grain yieldse3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
1.87 Mg ha –1e3
Comparator
split‐applied prilled ureae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“a single pre‐plant application of controlled‐release urea resulted in average grain yields of 1.57 and 1.87 Mg ha –1 compared to 1.32 and 1.30 Mg ha –1 in the case of the recommended practice of split‐applied prilled urea in the years 2002 and 2003, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea gave the highest agronomic N use efficiency, 15–20 kg grain per kg N applied.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
controlled‐release ureae4
Outcome
agronomic N use efficiencye4
Direction
higheste4
Value
15–20 kg grain per kg N appliede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest agronomic N use efficiency of 15–20 kg grain per kg N applied and the highest apparent N recovery of 39%–45% were attained with controlled‐release urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1932 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea gave the highest apparent N recovery, 39%–45%.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Treatment
controlled‐release ureae4
Outcome
apparent N recoverye4
Direction
higheste4
Value
39%–45%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The highest agronomic N use efficiency of 15–20 kg grain per kg N applied and the highest apparent N recovery of 39%–45% were attained with controlled‐release urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1932 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release urea is particularly beneficial for upland rice cultivation under variable rainfall, provided weeds are controlled.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativat0
Outcome
beneficial for upland‐rice cultivatione5
Qualifier
under variable rainfall conditions, provided weeds are controllede5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“suggesting that this N form is particularly beneficial for upland‐rice cultivation under variable rainfall conditions, provided weeds are controlled”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1934–2082 · show in text ↑
t0

“the productivity of upland rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–76 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.