Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar 0.75 M Mn gave maximum grain Mn concentration in the first experiment.

A claim from MANGANESE NUTRITION IMPROVES THE PRODUCTIVITY AND GRAIN BIOFORTIFICATION OF BREAD WHEAT IN ALKALINE CALCAREOUS SOIL · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.75 M Mn gave maximum grain Mn concentration in the first experiment.

Taxon
BREAD WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
foliar application of 0.75 M Mn solutione0
Outcome
grain Mn concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Setting
Faisalabade0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first experiment conducted at Faisalabad during 2012–2013, maximum grain yield was recorded with Mn seed priming (0.1 M Mn solution), while maximum grain Mn concentration was recorded with foliar application of 0.75 M Mn solution and seed coating with 250 mg Mn kg −1 seed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–733
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

MANGANESE NUTRITION IMPROVES THE PRODUCTIVITY AND GRAIN BIOFORTIFICATION OF BREAD WHEAT IN ALKALINE CALCAREOUS SOIL

AMAN ULLAH; MUHAMMAD FAROOQ; ABDUL REHMAN; et al. Experimental Agriculture 2017. doi:10.1017/s0014479717000369

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-92f796702ae718ab18bc11af36fdea19bbbefdf4f0daef41e5b172c651d38ab2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

266 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.