Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The treatment gave highest primary branches per plant at 15.66.

A claim from Influence of integrated weed management on weed dynamics and productivity of chili · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment gave highest primary branches per plant at 15.66.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
Pendimethalin @ 1.5 l/ha + black polythene mulche0
Outcome
number of primary branches per plante0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.66e0
Comparator
Pendimethalin @ 1.5 l/ha + paddy straw mulche0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Pendimethalin @ 1.5 l/ha + black polythene mulch resulted in the highest plant height (75.3 cm), number of primary branches per plant (15.66), number of fruits per plant (73.33), yield of red ripe fruit (134.7q/ha-1) and yield of dry fruit (22qha-1) followed by Pendimethalin @ 1.5 l/ha + paddy straw mulch.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–841
t0

“chili”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82

Title

Influence of integrated weed management on weed dynamics and productivity of chili

RP JAISWAL; DHANANJAI SINGH; AK NAIDU Journal of AgriSearch 2018. doi:10.21921/jas.5.3.2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-93e2aaa8d9931f36bbf2aae5761acc450bf4b62996b5ea9e88dfc18adcd1054d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

poly(ethylene) · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

pendimethalin · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.