Intervention effectmodel-written summary

High extract concentrations reduced germination in wheat.

A claim from Phytotoxic effects of Stellera chamaejasme L. root extract · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High extract concentrations reduced germination in wheat.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
high concentration extract (50 and 100 g/L)e0
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with high concentration extract (50 and 100 g/L) significantly reduced the germination rate of four crops compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–576
t0

“Stellera chamaejasme L. root extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–58
e1

“rapeseed (Brassica napus), sesame (Sesamum indicum), wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–428

Title

Phytotoxic effects of Stellera chamaejasme L. root extract

Lin Ma; Hongli Wu; Ru Bai; et al. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2011. doi:10.5897/ajar10.732

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-9945bf59527d50b7b6cf9f47ff5fc15237d99513e978ae1640052b0c155ff77d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this claim · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

426 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.