Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Vertically rotary sub-soiling tillage decreased soil water storage in 0-300 cm by 11.4, 14.8 and 20.5 mm relative to SS, TT and ZT, with no significant difference among methods.

A claim from Effects of different tillage methods on maize water utilization and yield under double ridge-furrow and plastic mulching on semi-arid area of northwest China · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vertically rotary sub-soiling tillage decreased soil water storage in 0-300 cm by 11.4, 14.8 and 20.5 mm relative to SS, TT and ZT, with no significant difference among methods.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse4
Treatment
vertically rotary sub-soiling tillagee1
Outcome
soil water storage in 0-300 cm profilee6
Direction
decreasede6
Value
11.4, 14.8 and 20.5 mme6
Comparator
SS, TT and ZTe6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“vertically rotary sub-soiling tillage for 40 cm depth (VRT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1165
e4

“water use efficiency of maize on semiarid rain-fed area of northwest Loess Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–901
e6

“the soil water storage in 0-300 cm profile of VRT were decreased by 11.4, 14.8 and 20.5 mm, as compared with SS, TT and ZT, there were no significant difference among the four tillage methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2795–2986

Title

Effects of different tillage methods on maize water utilization and yield under double ridge-furrow and plastic mulching on semi-arid area of northwest China

张绪成,马一凡,王红丽,侯慧芝,于显枫,方彦杰,汤瑛芳 ZHANG Xucheng Acta Ecologica Sinica 2021. doi:10.5846/stxb202001270176

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-99dbafafa7f06b07c263772e178497d313cbbfe72e46de25d2dc8b4f282cb49c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 123 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.