Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 75% STCR/FYM maize module followed by 100% P for chickpea increased chickpea productivity and nutrient uptake.

A claim from Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in maize-chickpea sequence under various integrated nutrient modules in a Vertisol of Central India · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75% STCR/FYM maize module followed by 100% P for chickpea increased chickpea productivity and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
application of 75% STCR dose + FYM @ 5t ha-1to maize followed by 100% P only to chickpeae0
Outcome
productivity and nutrient uptake in chickpeae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% STCR dose + FYM @ 5t ha-1to maize followed by 100% P only to chickpea and (2) application of FYM @ 20t ha-1to maize followed by FYM @ 5t ha-1 to chickpea increased the productivity and nutrient uptake in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1387

Title

Performance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in maize-chickpea sequence under various integrated nutrient modules in a Vertisol of Central India

Chetan Kumar Dotaniya; Brij Lal Lakaria; Yogesh Sharma; et al. PLoS ONE 2022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262652

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-9a24cc1e02cddf2e04fb7299ddf79324f0d7ae0b715ffd659834d06d5748b4e9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.