Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rainy-season maize had little effect on subsequent chickpea yield relative to fallow.

A claim from Improved Cropping Systems for the Deep Vertisols of the Indian Semi-arid Tropics · 1982

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainy-season maize had little effect on subsequent chickpea yield relative to fallow.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
rainy season maize crope0
Outcome
yields of post-rainy season crops of sorghum, chickpea and pigeonpeae0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
traditional fallowinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The introduction of a rainy season maize crop, compared with traditional fallowing, had little effect on the yields of post-rainy season crops of sorghum, chickpea and pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–328

Title

Improved Cropping Systems for the Deep Vertisols of the Indian Semi-arid Tropics

M. S. Reddy; R. W. Willey Experimental Agriculture 1982. doi:10.1017/s0014479700013831

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e56bbe677d5efd4524c56e0620002204af1c49f11be2cbbc1eb4f6642d116753 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Zea mays · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

rainfall · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

climate site · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 5 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.