Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping of raya with rainfed rabi crops increased crop yield by 10–25%.

A claim from Impact of Dryland Technology on Crop Yield in Nara-Dada Watershed of Submontanous Tracts of Punjab · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping of raya with rainfed rabi crops increased crop yield by 10–25%.

Treatment
Intercropping of raya with rainfed rabi cropse4
Outcome
crop yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Value
10–25%e4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Intercropping of raya with rainfed rabi crops viz. wheat, lentil and chickpea increased the crop yield by 10–25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1066

Title

Impact of Dryland Technology on Crop Yield in Nara-Dada Watershed of Submontanous Tracts of Punjab

Sukhvinder Singh; Parvender Sheoran; B. S. Sidhu; et al. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2006

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c590f855bc560fea3ef3c2e8226bbd82117d4dbc777f70d644d9546186df1868 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

rainfall · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 32 positive, 49 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 48 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

180 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

rainfall · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.