Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GB reduced stem bowl cracking incidence and severity at harvest versus water, with greater effectiveness.

A claim from Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications of Calcium Chloride and Glycine Betaine Reduce Stem Bowl Cracking and Enhance the Cuticle in ‘Picnic’ Apples · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GB reduced stem bowl cracking incidence and severity at harvest versus water, with greater effectiveness.

Material
‘Picnic’t0
Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
incidence and severity of stem bowl crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
GB exhibiting greater effectivenesse0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CaCl 2 and GB treatments significantly reduced the incidence and severity of stem bowl cracking at harvest compared to the control, with GB exhibiting greater effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140

Title

Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications of Calcium Chloride and Glycine Betaine Reduce Stem Bowl Cracking and Enhance the Cuticle in ‘Picnic’ Apples

Hong Kyoo Kim; Jung-Geun Kwon; Nay Myo Win; et al. Horticultural Science and Technology 2025. doi:10.7235/hort.20250039

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9bcbad6a809df1aa5b5a273f77af92cfe1d4469d055001a6ef9279e7feae30ad · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

glycine betaine · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.