Paper · 2025 · Horticultural Science and Technology

Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications of Calcium Chloride and Glycine Betaine Reduce Stem Bowl Cracking and Enhance the Cuticle in ‘Picnic’ Apples

Hong Kyoo Kim; Jung-Geun Kwon; Nay Myo Win; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Stem bowl cracking in apples can significantly reduce fruit quality and market value.Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of pre-harvest foliar applications of calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ), glycine betaine (GB), and water (control) in reducing stem bowl cracking, enhancing fruit quality, and improving the cuticle of 'Picnic' apples at harvest and during 3 months of cold storage at 0C.Both CaCl 2 and GB treatments significantly reduced the incidence and severity of stem bowl cracking at harvest compared to the control, with GB exhibiting greater effectiveness.Foliar applications also enhanced the morphological characteristics (area, weight, and thickness) of the fruit cuticle.Furthermore, pre-harvest treatments did not affect fruit quality parameters, such as fruit weight, size, firmness, titratable acidity (TA), internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and starch pattern index (SPI) at harvest, apart from an increase in soluble solids content (SSC).During cold storage, CaCl 2 and GB treatments did not affect IEC, firmness, or SPI but slowed the rate of TA loss and moderated changes in fruit color, including an increase in a* and a decrease in L*, particularly on the sun-exposed side of the fruit.Additionally, the GB-treated group exhibited higher SSC during storage compared to other groups.Overall, this study demonstrates that pre-harvest foliar applications of CaCl 2 and GB effectively mitigate stem bowl cracking in 'Picnic' apples by enhancing the cuticle's structure and composition.However, their influence on overall fruit quality at harvest and during postharvest storage is relatively limited.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 reduced stem bowl cracking incidence and severity at harvest versus water.

Material
‘Picnic’t0
Treatment
CaCl 2e0
Outcome
incidence and severity of stem bowl crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CaCl 2 and GB treatments significantly reduced the incidence and severity of stem bowl cracking at harvest compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GB reduced stem bowl cracking incidence and severity at harvest versus water, with greater effectiveness.

Material
‘Picnic’t0
Treatment
GBe0
Outcome
incidence and severity of stem bowl crackinge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
GB exhibiting greater effectivenesse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both CaCl 2 and GB treatments significantly reduced the incidence and severity of stem bowl cracking at harvest compared to the control, with GB exhibiting greater effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar applications enhanced cuticle area, weight, and thickness.

Treatment
Foliar applicationse0
Outcome
area, weight, and thickness) of the fruit cuticlee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications also enhanced the morphological characteristics (area, weight, and thickness) of the fruit cuticle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest treatments did not affect fruit weight, size, or firmness at harvest.

Treatment
pre-harvest treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit weight, size, firmnesse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pre-harvest treatments did not affect fruit quality parameters, such as fruit weight, size, firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest treatments did not affect TA, IEC, or SPI at harvest.

Treatment
pre-harvest treatmentse1
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA), internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and starch pattern index (SPI)e0
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“titratable acidity (TA), internal ethylene concentration (IEC), and starch pattern index (SPI) at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–910 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-harvest treatments did not affect fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest treatments increased SSC at harvest.

Treatment
pre-harvest treatmentse1
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC)e0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in soluble solids content (SSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–966 · show in text ↑
e1

“pre-harvest treatments did not affect fruit quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–765 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 and GB did not affect IEC, firmness, or SPI during storage.

Treatment
CaCl 2 and GB treatmentse0
Outcome
IEC, firmness, or SPIe0
Direction
did not affecte0
Setting
cold storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage, CaCl 2 and GB treatments did not affect IEC, firmness, or SPI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 and GB slowed TA loss during cold storage.

Treatment
CaCl 2 and GB treatmentse0
Outcome
rate of TA losse0
Direction
slowede0
Setting
cold storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During cold storage, CaCl 2 and GB treatments did not affect IEC, firmness, or SPI but slowed the rate of TA loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 and GB moderated fruit color changes during cold storage, increasing a* and decreasing L*.

Treatment
CaCl 2 and GB treatmentse1
Outcome
changes in fruit colore0
Direction
moderatede0
Qualifier
particularly on the sun-exposed side of the fruite0
Setting
cold storagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderated changes in fruit color, including an increase in a* and a decrease in L*, particularly on the sun-exposed side of the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1218 · show in text ↑
e1

“During cold storage, CaCl 2 and GB treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GB-treated apples had higher SSC during storage.

Treatment
GB-treated groupe0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other groupse0
Setting
storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the GB-treated group exhibited higher SSC during storage compared to other groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Picnic’ Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑

glycine betaine · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

calcium dichloride · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

calcium dichloride · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

calcium dichloride · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

glycine betaine · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glycine betaine · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.